Digitising for preservation
- It is preferable for public exhibition and publication purposes, as publishers may wish to apply custom compression, dependent on delivery platform;
- Uncompressed data best meets the requirements of restoration and post-production;
- Existing procedures within the archival, museum and cultural heritage sectors prohibit the needless loss of information. Good practice involves pre-empting the application of similar measures to audio-visual and digital data.
For a discussion of the arguments for uncompressed storage, and an account of a process analogous to ours, see Franz Pavuza and Julia Ahamer's paper, "Linear Uncompressed Video Archiving on High-Performance Computer Tapes".
Our preservation process involves outputting analogue audio-visual data from contemporaneous U-Matic video players. This data is digitised via image stabilising hardware by two custom-built PC capture stations. The large size of this uncompressed video data necessitates the use of a low-cost yet well-trialled storage medium. Our primary storage medium is Linear Tape-Open (LTO) Ultrium, a format used heavily by the information technology community for reliable data storage. All data is error-checked and written to two separate LTO tapes which are held in geographically separate locations under a continuous cycle of error checking, refreshment and periodic migration. One set of data is held in the University of Bristol's Theatre Collection; a second identical security copy is deposited with AHDS.
In addition to this set of uncompressed archival masters, we identified the need for a second distinct digital data set of relatively low resolution content to serve as access copies; for this stage, see Preserving for access.
