Browse/search for people

Publication - Dr Paul Vardanega

    Categories of SHM Deployments

    Technologies and Capabilities

    Citation

    Webb, GT, Vardanega, PJ & Middleton, CR, 2015, ‘Categories of SHM Deployments: Technologies and Capabilities’. Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol 20.

    Abstract

    The findings of an extensive literature survey focussing on bridge structural health monitoring deployments are presented. Conventional, maturing and emerging technologies are reviewed as well as deployment considerations for new Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) endeavours. The lack of published calibration studies (and quantification of uncertainty studies) for new sensors is highlighted as a major concern and area for future research. There are currently very few examples of SHM systems which have clearly provided significant value to the owners of monitored structures. The results of the literature survey are used to propose a categorisation system to better assess the potential outcomes of bridge SHM deployments. It is shown that SHM studies can be categorized as one of (or a combination of) the following: (1) Anomaly Detection; (2) Sensor Deployment Studies; (3) Model Validation, (4) Threshold Check and (5) Damage Detection. The new framework aids engineers specifying monitoring systems to determine what should be measured and why, hence allowing them to better evaluate what value may be delivered to the relevant stakeholders for the monitoring investments.

    Full details in the University publications repository