triangle Defend USS - the USS pensions dispute

Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) is the principal pension scheme provided by Universities, Higher Education and other associated institutions for their employees.

UCU are in industrial dispute with our employers over imposed changes to USS benefits, though industrial action is currently suspended pending the outcome of negotiations.

(Back to top)

Progress on talks (May 2013)

28 May 2013: UCU Congress HE Sector Conference received and approved a report and recommendations from the HEC's Superannuation Working Group.

This report, the USS report to sector conference - May 2013 (UCUHE191, PDF), provides:

In brief, the negotiating environment is more difficult than last year and we may have to move towards the achievement of our objectives by a series of incremental steps rather than a single comprehensive settlement. Nonetheless, we are pursuing these negotiating objectives in talks with the employers' representatives scheduled in June and July and planned to continue from September onwards.

Congress also carried an amended Motion HE35 on responsible investment by USS.

On recent USS valuations

UCU recognises that some changes were necessary so that USS can guarantee to meet its future liabilities to pay the pensions for which it is liable. After all, people are living longer, so drawing more in pension payments from the scheme. The changes introduced in October 2011 were designed to, and were adequate to, safeguard USS against increasing longevity.

This latest triennial valuation took place as at 31 March 2011, when the funding level of the scheme on its technical provisions basis was 92%. By March 2012, the funding position had deteriorated to 77%. Clearly, a large and rapid fluctuation like this cannot be accounted for by increasing longevity or other effects acting over the long term. The real reason for the large drop in funding that has recently affected most final salary pension schemes is a combination of the current unusual macroeconomic policy and new stricter and relatively inflexible pension valuation regulations (see the National Association of Pension Funds October 2012 paper: DB funding - a call to action, PDF).  

In response to the global financial crisis, the government has extended its policy of “quantitative easing” which has resulted in the yield on government bonds (Gilts) sinking to an all-time low – in fact, fluctuating around zero. It is this collapse of the Gilt yield that has had a major and detrimental impact on the estimated funding level of USS as measured by the contested methodology (see which has, at least until very recently, been practically imposed by the Pensions Regulator). This methodology insists that the Gilt yield must be the key factor in estimating the value of USS liabilities. This is why, at its most recent on-going valuation, the funding level of USS was calculated to have as low as 77%. UCU would contend that this paper exercise bears little relationship to the real value of assets and liabilities and that these figures have not emerged from a formal triennial valuation so do not require any immediate action from USS.

News and events

National

See more national news »

Local

(Back to top)


Why are we in dispute?

Our national employers' representatives have imposed an inferior, two tier USS pension system which will see new starters receive much lower benefits; reduce protection of our pensions against inflation and reduce the amount staff receive if they are made redundant.

The proposals have been opposed by USS members in two referendums, and by UCU members in two industrial action ballots, but the employers have insisted on imposing them (history of this dispute). We suspended our working to contract in February 2012 in the hope of meaningful talks with the employers, but the talks so far have failed to deliver any concrete proposals to improve the changes imposed (on existing members and a much worse scheme for new entrants) and at present the Teachers Pension Scheme (TPS) is still far superior to what is being offered to our members. As such the UCU has called for a return to working to contract to further empower our negotiators. For technical details of the comparison of USS and TPC see the appendices to UCUHE/154 (PDF).

More about the USS changes >>> including facts and figures on what USS members stand to lose as the result of these changes.

(Back to top)


Information for members about taking action

Industrial action (work to contract) is currently suspended pending the outcome of negotiations. Please note that the special sector conference motions explicitly guaranteed that the return to normal working does not imply we are willing to work excessive hours. We have a locally negotiated workload protection agreement at Bristol.

Defend USS

defenduss.web.ucu.org.uk our national UCU action website.

Defend USS - working to contract logo

Local information

Our members in Bristol are suspending working to contract from Wednesday 23 September.

More about the industrial action >>> including how to ask a question.

(Back to top)


Background, resources and related campaigns

Local UCU pages

National briefings

National UCU resources

Related campaigns

(Back to top)

Note: some of the documents on this webpage are in PDF format. In order to view a PDF you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader Get Acrobat Reader