View all news

Lack of monitoring impairs bat conservation research

Image of a grey long-eared bat, Plecotus austriacus, in flight

Grey long-eared bat, Plecotus austriacus, in flight Antton Alberdi

Press release issued: 12 December 2013

Millions of pounds are being spent to protect bats from disturbance by building development and renovations, however a lack of follow-up monitoring makes it difficult to tell whether conservation efforts are effective.

Researchers from the University of Bristol Mammal Research Unit found that between 2003 and 2005 an estimated £4.3 million was spent by developers in England to provide new homes for displaced bats, but less than 20 per cent of sites were monitored afterwards for their impact on bat populations.

Dr Emma Stone, lead author of the study, said: "Despite the licensing process and the millions spent on it each year, we are still unable to assess the impacts of the mitigation and development on bat populations."

All UK bat species are endangered and are protected by the European Union Habitats Directive.  It is illegal to damage a bat roost or disturb, capture or injure a bat.  However developers who wish to modify a building containing bats can apply to Natural England for a license that permits necessary disturbance, providing that they take measures to maintain the local bat population.

The license holder must provide new roosting areas for bats displaced by building developments, such as bat boxes and bat lofts.  These are assumed to be 100 per cent successful by Natural England.  However the study showed that this could be overly optimistic because only 74 per cent of bat lofts were found to contain bats in the areas monitored post-development. New bat roosts were on average half the size of the original roost spaces, a direct contradiction to Natural England's recommendation to "maintain roost size as close to the original as possible".  Bats may not be able to use these smaller spaces, but conservationists cannot look for any potential links because of a lack of follow-up information.

Dr Stone said: "The current derogation licensing system is neither cost effective nor fit for purpose, and needs to be overhauled to make it evidence-based and quantifiable."

Since 2010, the licensing process was changed so that developers have to include post-development monitoring of the effects of mitigation measures such as bat boxes on the local bat population.  This would provide more information about the impacts of development on bats, however Dr Stone believes more needs to be done to evaluate the information obtained.  "Overall there are still huge improvements required, including a shift in approach from form-filling to an evidence-based approach," she said.

Members of the public can help bat conservation by being aware of any changes to bat roosts and reporting any activities that they are concerned about to the Bat Conservation Trust helpline on 0845 1300 228 (calls charged at local rate).

Paper

'Mitigating the Effect of Development on Bats in England with Derogation Licensing' by Emma Louise Stone, Gareth Jones and Stephen Harris in Conservation Biology

The Cabot Institute

The Cabot Institute at the University of Bristol carries out fundamental and responsive research on risks and uncertainties in a changing environment.  Its interests include natural hazards, food and energy security, resilience and governance, and human impacts on the environment.  Its research fuses rigorous statistical and numerical modelling with a deep understanding of interconnected social, environmental and engineered systems – past, present and future.  It seeks to engage wider society – listening to, exploring with, and challenging our stakeholders to develop a shared response to twenty-first century challenges.

 

More news