Skip to main content

Unit information: Performing the Archive: Re-use, Re-enactment and Adaptation in 2013/14

Please note: you are viewing unit and programme information for a past academic year. Please see the current academic year for up to date information.

Unit name Performing the Archive: Re-use, Re-enactment and Adaptation
Unit code DRAM23129
Credit points 20
Level of study I/5
Teaching block(s) Teaching Block 1 (weeks 1 - 12)
Unit director Dr. Kate Elswit
Open unit status Not open
Pre-requisites

None

Co-requisites

None

School/department Department of Theatre
Faculty Faculty of Arts

Description including Unit Aims

Archival documents, drawn from the Theatre Collection, and play texts are used by researchers as evidence of the past, for the writing of histories. This unit will explore the relationship of documents and texts to the future, and how students can use them as the inspiration for making new work. A range of ways of working with documents and texts in performance will be introduced, of doing historiography practically. Students will explore strategies for re-using documents and texts, re-making and re-enacting past events or performances, translating and adapting archival materials or texts for contemporary performance contexts. The unit will investigate the relationship between performance, documentation and documentary, between the archive and history, including oral histories, memory and the embodied repertoire. Students will work collaboratively towards the presentation of performance re-enactments, re-makes or staged adaptations, and/ or the analytical presentation of documents or texts.

Aims

  • To explore critically a range of performance practices.
  • To develop appropriate critical and theoretical approaches to the chosen practices.
  • To investigate in a chosen practical and creative manner one or more alternative languages of theatrical expression.
  • To develop appropriate self-reflective analytical methods.
  • To develop production skills for theatre practice.
  • To develop group-work project skills.
  • To be able to reflect on individual work within a collaborative production context.

Intended Learning Outcomes

  • To demonstrate sound knowledge of key secondary literature
  • To be aware of, and able to apply a range of established critical and theoretical ideas
  • To present a clear and well-structured argument, supported by relevant critical and theoretical literature
  • To present work that is consistently accurate in terms of its use of English and referencing
  • To be able to communicate verbally key ideas based on secondary reading and relevant primary texts
  • To demonstrate skills of time management
  • To plan and execute a research project

Plus as appropriate to the mode of teaching, that is, the combination of seminar and practice-based workshop and/or presentations:

  • To be able to write a reflective account of practical work
  • To be able to work constructively and creatively in a group-based workshop
  • To be able to work within the disciplines of production and project processes, working to deadlines and within production budgets
  • To work independently and reach individual/personal judgements within a collaborative context
  • To be able to reflect on individual work within a collaborative production context

Teaching Information

Seminars, workshops, screenings, as appropriate

Optional units may be taught according one of three models, depending on student numbers choosing the option and resource matters. Unit convenors will decide on teaching mode in consultation with HoE and with students in advance of advertising option year-on-year. Contact hours and assessment details will be mapped to teaching mode, as detailed below.

Model A is a seminar-based unit

Model B combines seminars with workshops encompassing an average 30-hour production period

Model C is taught through workshops encompassing an intensive 60-hour production period

Assessment Information

Teachers will assign assessments according to the teaching mode employed.

Model A:

3,000-word essay (50%) + student presentation (25%) + 1,500-word write-up (25%), or equivalent.

OR

Model B:

Essay [1,500 words] (33%) +

Workfile (22%): containing evidence to demonstrate student contribution to workshops / practical exercises; contribution to seminars Presentation/performance (22%) Critical analysis [1,500 words] (22%)

OR

Model C:

Workfile (33%): containing evidence to demonstrate student contribution to workshops / practical exercises; contribution to seminars, preparation & execution of technical production role Presentation/performance (33%) Critical analysis [1,500 words] (33%)

Reading and References

  • Auslander, P (2006) ‘The Performativity of Performance Documentation.’ PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art, 28, no. 3, 1-10.
  • Bacon, Julie, ed. (2008) Arkive City, Ulster and Newcastle: Interface, University of Ulster and Locus+.
  • Merewether, Charles (2006) The Archive: Documents of Contemporary Art, London: Whitechapel.
  • Perteghella, Manuela (2008), 'Adaptation: "Bastard Child or Critique". Putting terminology centre stage', Journal of Romance Studies, Vol. 8, Nr.3, winter 2008, pp.51-65
  • Schneider, R. (2001) “Performance Remains”, Performance Research 6: 2, pp. 100-108.
  • Taylor, Diana (2007) The Archive and the Repertoire, Durham: Duke University Press.

Feedback