Unit name | Politics of Disasters |
---|---|
Unit code | POLIM0038 |
Credit points | 20 |
Level of study | M/7 |
Teaching block(s) |
Teaching Block 2 (weeks 13 - 24) |
Unit director | Dr. Christie |
Open unit status | Not open |
Pre-requisites |
NONE |
Co-requisites |
NONE |
School/department | School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies |
Faculty | Faculty of Social Sciences and Law |
Disasters can be caused by geological phenomena, the environment, or can be man-made, and these can be relatively slow onset events, or can occur suddenly with little to no notice. The social impact of these events can be dramatic: natural disasters alone kill around 70,000 people per year on average, and directly affect over 21 million people per year. Yet, disasters have received relatively little attention within the study of international relations, security and development. This unit starts from the assumption that there are no ‘natural’ disasters, and that they must be understood as inherently socio-political events. The unit will provide an overview of the evolution of disaster studies in general, and will explore pressing questions about the politics of disasters. It will introduce students to core concepts around disasters, including risk, hazards, vulnerabilities and resilience. Throughout we will examine how social categories can impact on one’s exposure to risk. In addition we will examine the relationships between state legitimacy and disasters, as well as pressing questions related to intra and inter-state conflict, and international responses to disasters.
Unit Aims:
On successful completion of the unit, students will be able to:
MSc = 2 hour seminar
The following methods will be used:
This unit will involve a combination of seminar, lectures (within seminar) and group activities to meet its stated objectives. Most of the classes will be broken into two parts, with the first portion being a seminar style for students to discuss the readings and themes, and the second being a formal lecture where the instructor will cover the week’s themes in greater detail. The lecture will follow the seminar to enable the students to critically explore the weeks’ themes, and to undertake a deep-reading of selected texts.
Where appropriate multi-media will be used to provide students with a sense of the impact of disasters.
The unit will make use of the blackboard system to have a directed conversation amongst the students and the instructor about the course material. Students will be expected to participate in the online conversation by contributing short comments to discussion threads.
Formative: Student Presentation – Linking a week’s conceptual discussion to a specific case study. This will allow for provision of feedback from the unit owner on the extent to which students have demonstrated an ability to meet the aims and intended learning outcomes of the unit (Intended Learning Outcomes 1 and 3 in particular), with suggestions for further improvement.
Summative Assessment (100%) 4000 word essay – The summative essay will allow for assessment of students’ ability to meet the Intended Learning Outcomes 1-4 by requiring students to develop an in-depth essay argument over a length of 4000 words that draws upon relevant readings, materials and debates covered in the unit.
Christie, R., Cooke, O., and Gottsmann, J. (2015) ‘Fearing the knock on the door: critical security studies insights into limited cooperation with disaster management regimes’, Journal of Applied Volcanology, 4:1-15.
Hollis, S. (2017) “Bridging international relations and disaster studies: the case of disaster–conflict scholarship,” in Disasters (epub ahead of print).
Tierney, K. J. (2007) “From the Margins to the Mainstream: Disaster Research at the Crossroads,” in Annual Review of Sociology, 33: 503-25.
Wisner B., Blaikie P., Cannon T. and Davis I. (2004) At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
Fothergill A. (1996) “Gender, risk, and disaster,” in International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 14: 33–56.
Pelling M. and Dill K. (2010) ‘Disaster politics: tipping points for change in the adaptation of sociopolitical regimes’, Progress in Human Geography 34: 21–37.
Le Billon P. and Waizenegger A. (2007) “Peace in the wake of disaster? Secessionist conflicts and the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami,” in Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 32: 411–27.
Hilhorst, T. (2013) Disaster, conflict and society in crises: everyday politics of crisis response, New York: Routledge.
Nel, P. and Marjolein R. (2008) “’Natural Disasters and the Risk of Violent Civil Conflict’, International Studies Quarterly, 52: 159-185.
Nelson, T. (2010) ‘Rejecting the gift horse: international politics of disaster aid refusal’, Conflict, Security & Development, 10:379-402.
Flores, A. Q., and A. Smith (2013) ‘Leader Survival and Natural Disasters’, British Journal of Political Science, 43: 821–843.