Skip to main content

Unit information: Death, dying and disease in 2013/14

Please note: you are viewing unit and programme information for a past academic year. Please see the current academic year for up to date information.

Unit name Death, dying and disease
Unit code PHIL30115
Credit points 20
Level of study H/6
Teaching block(s) Teaching Block 2 (weeks 13 - 24)
Unit director Professor. Carel
Open unit status Not open
Pre-requisites

PHIL10005: Introduction to Philosophy A; PHIL 10006: Introduction to Philosophy B; PHIL20046: Realism and Normativity

Co-requisites

None

School/department Department of Philosophy
Faculty Faculty of Arts

Description including Unit Aims

This unit will provide a systematic study of key philosophical themes relating to death, dying, and disease. This is an advanced unit, and will require students to engage with the texts and themes at a high level, involving in-depth and sustained critical engagement appropriate to advanced undergraduate work. Key philosophical questions to be studied are: (1) is death a harm, and if so, what kind of harm is it? (2) should mortality (and our awareness of it) change how we live? (3) would immortality be a good thing? (4) how does bodily vulnerability shape us? These themes will be studied drawing on a range of philosophical resources, including Epicurus, Thomas Nagel, Bernard Williams, JM Fischer and Martin Heidegger.

Intended Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this unit students will have (1) developed an advanced detailed knowledge of the main philosophical literature on death; (2) developed a critical understanding, as appropriate for final year undergraduates, of the central concepts in the death literature, e.g. immortality, posthumous harm, being-towards-death; (3) acquired an understanding of philosophical approaches to death including deprivation theory, Epicureanism, and phenomenology; (4) demonstrated their ability to philosophically analyse and critically appraise the main arguments in the literature; (5) strengthened their skills in philosophical writing and argumentation, and (6) strengthened their skills in oral presentation of philosophical argument.

Teaching Information

10 x 1-hour lectures + 10 x 1-hour seminars.

Assessment Information

Summative assessment in three forms:

  • Presentation 20%.
  • Essay (2,000 – 2,500 words) 40%.
  • Exam (3 questions out of 8) 40%.

No formative assessment – instead, the instructor will use the presentation (which contributes moderately to the final mark) as a chance to give feedback on progress.

The essay and exam will assess ILOs 1-5: (1) knowledge of the main philosophical literature on death; (2) critical understanding of the central concepts in the death literature, e.g. immortality, posthumous harm, being-towards-death; (3) understanding of philosophical approaches to death including deprivation theory, Epicureanism, and phenomenology; (4) ability to philosophically analyse the main arguments in the literature; (5) skills in philosophical writing and argumentation.

The class presentation will assess learning outcomes (1), (3), and (4), as well as (6) skills in oral presentation of philosophical argument.

Reading and References

Fischer JM (1993). The Metaphysics of Death. Stanford CA: Stanford UP. Warren J. (2004). Facing Death: Epicurus and His Critics. Oxford: Oxford UP. Heidegger M. (1962 [1927]). Being and time. London: Blackwell.

Feedback