Skip to main content

Unit information: Texts in Early Modern Philosophy: Empiricism in 2017/18

Please note: you are viewing unit and programme information for a past academic year. Please see the current academic year for up to date information.

Unit name Texts in Early Modern Philosophy: Empiricism
Unit code PHIL10031
Credit points 10
Level of study C/4
Teaching block(s) Teaching Block 2 (weeks 13 - 24)
Unit director Dr. Everett
Open unit status Not open
Pre-requisites

none

Co-requisites

none

School/department Department of Philosophy
Faculty Faculty of Arts

Description including Unit Aims

The course will consider a key text in early modern philosophy's empiricist cannon (for example: Locke's Essay on Human Understanding, Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Berkeley's Three Dialogues) and engage with it philosophically.

Aims:

The unit aims to bring to life a seminal text in early modern philosophy by engaging critically with its arguments. The unit aims to establish this work as philosophically interesting in its own right and of interest to contemporary philosophers.

Intended Learning Outcomes

On completion of this course, students will:

(1) have a thorough knowledge of a key text from early modern philosophy.

(2) be familiar with some key secondary literature on this text, and be able to engage critically with it.

(3) be able to engage critically with the author's positions and arguments.

(4) be in a position to relate some key ideas in this text to modern philosophical debates.

Teaching Information

11 one-hour lectures

Assessment Information

One 2000-3000 word essay, from a list of questions designed to test intended learning outcomes (1), (2), (3) and (4).

Reading and References

The target text.

At least one contemporaneous text.

At least one modern introduction to the target philosopher/text.

Illustrative examples:

  • Key text: John Locke, Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689, OUP Clarendon Edition 1975);
  • secondary text: Cambridge Companion to Locke, ed Newman, (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

Feedback