Skip to main content

Unit information: Public History in Theory and Practice in 2013/14

Please note: you are viewing unit and programme information for a past academic year. Please see the current academic year for up to date information.

Unit name Public History in Theory and Practice
Unit code HISTM0023
Credit points 20
Level of study M/7
Teaching block(s) Teaching Block 1 (weeks 1 - 12)
Unit director Professor. Tim Cole
Open unit status Not open
Pre-requisites

None

Co-requisites

None

School/department Department of History (Historical Studies)
Faculty Faculty of Arts

Description including Unit Aims

This unit introduces students to the field of Public History through a multi-layered approach that integrates theoretical reflection with practical engagement (through the medium of external partnerships) to examine various influential areas of public history:popular history magazines, heritage sites, documentary film and museums. Meetings alternate between in-house seminars - during which critical concepts and central debates in public history are studied with academic staff - and external sessions with various Bristol-based practioners of public history: currently, BBC History Magazine, Arnos Vale Cemetary, Icon Films and SS Great Britain. With the editor of Britain's best selling popular history magazine, students contemplate the challenges of presenting history for a broad readership. With the public enagagement manager at Arnos Vale, students learn about the issues involved in interpreting a distinguished Victorian cemetary and managing a large, multiple value and multi-use site. With the creative director of Icon Films, students find out how a programme is conceived, from proposal writing and pitching to commissioning (one of the unit's assignments is the preparation of a proposal for a history documentary based on Icon's guidelines). And with the director of conservation and education at the SS Great Britain, students consider the challenges and opportunities involved in running one of Bristol's most popular visitor attractions, which is also attached to a major research facility, the Brunel Institute.

Intended Learning Outcomes

  • To develop critical understanding of theoretical, ideological and practical issues relating to themes in PH.
  • To develop a range of writing skills, including the crafting of TV documentary proposals as well as academic essays.
  • To reflect on the interface between historical studies as an academic discipline and the broader contexts of popular culture and social trends.

On successful completion of this unit, students will have an understanding of theoretical issues in PH, and will have examined case studies of controversial films, exhibitions etc. Students will also have gained an understanding of the concerns that shape the selection and presentation of history in TV documentaries, museum exhibition, heritage site and magazine formats (audience, budgets, narrative and visual requirements, educational and political issues). They will understand how these pressures shape the portrayal of a specific historical topic/theme/event in the context of research and the preparation of a TV ‘treatment’.

Teaching Information

10 seminars, some of these led by external partners

Assessment Information

This unit is assessed by a 3,000 word essay (worth 100% of the unit mark) and a 2,000 word TV proposal (marked on a pass/fail basis).

Reading and References

  • A. Brinkley, 'Historians and their Publics,' Journal of American History, 81/3 (1994): 1027-30
  • A, Sachs, 'American Arcadia: Mount Auburn Cemetery and the 19th Century Landscape Tradition', Environmental History 15 (2010): 206-35
  • A. Bosel , Homogenizing History: Accommodationist Discourse in Ken Burns's The Civil War (2003)
  • A. Shapiro, 'Whose (Which) History is it Anyway?,' History and Theory, 36/4 (1997): 1-3
  • Additional Case Study: Oil from the Arctic: Building the Trans-Alaska Pipeline (National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, 1997-98)
  • Andrew Gulliford, 'The West as America': Review, Journal of American History 79 (June 1992): 199-207

Feedback