Skip to main content

Unit information: Criminalising Welfare in 2019/20

Please note: Due to alternative arrangements for teaching and assessment in place from 18 March 2020 to mitigate against the restrictions in place due to COVID-19, information shown for 2019/20 may not always be accurate.

Please note: you are viewing unit and programme information for a past academic year. Please see the current academic year for up to date information.

Unit name Criminalising Welfare
Unit code SPOL20043
Credit points 20
Level of study I/5
Teaching block(s) Teaching Block 2 (weeks 13 - 24)
Unit director Dr. Kirwan
Open unit status Not open
Pre-requisites

None

Co-requisites

None

School/department School for Policy Studies
Faculty Faculty of Social Sciences and Law

Description including Unit Aims

This unit provides you with an understanding of how, as part of the shift from ‘social security’ to ‘welfare benefits’ systems in the UK and elsewhere, state welfare is being absorbed into and increasingly resembles criminal justice systems.

The unit aims to enable you to:

Critically examine the ways that welfare systems have become more punitive (e.g. ‘sanctions’, enforced unpaid labour and direct deductions from income).

Understand how claiming state welfare is increasingly experienced in criminal and punitive terms.

Explore the discourse of scrounging and benefit fraud.

Evaluate the ways in which welfare is prone to be understood as an area to be approached through models of crime control.

Intended Learning Outcomes

1. Identify how welfare benefit policies in advanced liberal democracies have been increasingly shaped by knowledges, strategies and practices taken from criminal justice systems.

2. Engage with how claimant-subjects are regulated, controlled and directed, as well as being drawn into criminal justice systems.

3. Discuss how the criminalisation of welfare fits into broader discussions of the ‘criminalisation of social policy’.

4. Present differing explanations for why social security systems internationally have become more punitive.

5. Identify and critically examine potential sites of resistance to the criminalisation of state welfare-benefits.

Teaching Information

10 x two-hour lecture

10 x one-hour seminar

Assessment Information

Case Study (1000 words) 25%

Seen exam (2 hours) (75%)

Reading and References

Cooper, M. (2017) Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and the New Social Conservatism. New York: Zone Books

Lazzarato, M. (2014) Governing by Debt. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotexte

Wacquant, L. (2009) Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press

Feedback