Skip to main content

Unit information: Broadband Wireless Communications in 2012/13

Please note: you are viewing unit and programme information for a past academic year. Please see the current academic year for up to date information.

Unit name Broadband Wireless Communications
Unit code EENGM4221
Credit points 10
Level of study M/7
Teaching block(s) Teaching Block 2 (weeks 13 - 24)
Unit director Dr. Armour
Open unit status Not open
Pre-requisites

EENG32500; EENG34200

Co-requisites

None

School/department School of Electrical, Electronic and Mechanical Engineering
Faculty Faculty of Engineering

Description including Unit Aims

This unit investigates the challenges inherent in the design of broadband wireless communications systems at Data Link Control (DLC) and Physical (PHY) layers. The solutions offered by current standards are used as case studies to demonstrate the relevant techniques and their limitations.

The unit serves both as an introduction to the details of these standards and an explanation of the design goals they attempt to meet and the wireless communication techniques that they employ to do so. Thus the unit not only answers the question of what techniques are used by modern broadband wireless standards but more importantly why.

Intended Learning Outcomes

On completion of this unit, students will:

  • Appreciate the challenges posed by the design of Physical and Data Link Layer protocols for Broadband Wireless Systems
  • Appreciate the distinctions between and implicit strengths and weaknesses of centralised and distributed Medium Access Control protocols and centralised and mesh communications
  • Understand the merits of Link Adaptation strategies for Broadband Wireless Communications
  • Be familiar with the concepts of ARQ and HARQ
  • Be familiar with the important Physical layer and Data Link Control layer features of current standards for Broadband Wireless, e.g.: 802.11 (WiFi); 802.15 (Bluetooth); 802.16 (WiMax)
  • Understand the implications of these features in terms of the above issues and thereby appreciate the strengths and limitations of these standards.

Teaching Information

Combination of lectures and laboratory sessions

Assessment Information

Taught Phase

The assessment of this material is via a combination of continuous assessment (usually laboratory assignments) and formal examination.

Laboratory work

At various times throughout the year you will be asked to write about an aspect of your laboratory. Unless otherwise instructed, you will be asked to submit this either as a Technical Note (TN) or as a Full Report (FR). In either case the report should be written on an individual basis even if the lab was performed in groups.

A TN is briefer than an FR: you should refer to The Guidelines on Writing Technical Reports (Section 2.4) for more information on their structure and content.

As an approximate guide, we suggest that a TN should be 1000 words plus diagrams etc., whereas a FR should be 3000 words plus diagrams etc. Our time calculations are based on you spending (at most) 12 hours writing a TN and (at most) 24 hours writing a FR.

Where appropriate, your laboratory notebook will also be inspected from time to time by a member of staff or a demonstrator. Coursework or laboratory assessments will normally contribute 10-20% of the total unit assessment (see unit breakdown information on the MSc website for specific unit details): http://www.bris.ac.uk/eeng/intranet/units/programmes.html

Project phase assessment

  • Interim report
  • Poster presentation
  • Final project thesis

Interim report assessment

The interim report will be independently assessed by both your supervisor and an assessor (these will be notified in advance). The assessment will be based on the following criteria:

  • Report
  • Presentation and standard of written English (including figure captions and titles, correct use of references, etc.).
  • Clear idea of objectives and relevance of project.
  • Review of related work.
  • Initial top level design and resource requirements.
  • Workplan, risks and critical paths.

Presentation and interview

  • 5-10 minute presentation to two members of academic staff, outlining aims and objectives, initial findings, and proposed research plan
  • Quality of answers

Poster presentation

This will be performed by two members of staff who will undertake the assessment separately. They will first read through your poster and then ask you a number of questions relating to the work described. You will be given the opportunity to present any demonstrations you have prepared.

Reading and References

  • A.Ganz, Z.Ganz, K.Wongthatvarawat, ‘Multimedia Wireless Networks: Technologies, Standards and QoS’, Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-046099-0
  • M.Gast, ‘802.11 Wireless Networks: The Definitive Guide,’ O’Reilly, ISBN:0-596-00183-5
  • W.Stallings, ‘Wireless Communications and Networks,’ Prentice Hall, ISBN: 0-13-040864-6
  • A.S. Tanenbaum, ‘Computer Networks (4th Edition),’ Prentice Hall, ISBN: 0-13-0384887

Feedback