Skip to main content

Unit information: Social Policy and Development in 2017/18

Please note: you are viewing unit and programme information for a past academic year. Please see the current academic year for up to date information.

Unit name Social Policy and Development
Unit code SPOL30050
Credit points 20
Level of study H/6
Teaching block(s) Teaching Block 1 (weeks 1 - 12)
Unit director Dr. Gangoli
Open unit status Open
Pre-requisites

None

Co-requisites

None

School/department School for Policy Studies
Faculty Faculty of Social Sciences and Law

Description including Unit Aims

The central aim of this unit is to analyse the relationship between social policies and the concept of development, and to demonstrate that comparative studies involve international systems. Starting with an analysis of theories of 'development', we will critique explanations propounded for uneven development between and within societies, and look at the role of gender, politics and power in debates around development. Policies pursued by "developing" countries and civil society action against globalisation and development inform future policy options and directions, and the unit will also explore and analyse social responses to policies on development. Comparisons here will include India and China.

The unit aims to:

  • Demonstrate that comparative studies involve international systems. Familiarise students with development theories and debates on international funding.
  • Examine relationships between the ‘developed’ and ‘developing’ countries.
  • Study policies followed by ‘developing’ countries, and civil society responses to these policies, and to international systems including globalisation.

Students will be expected to be able to critique the theoretical positions on development, including an understanding of the importance of gender dynamics in the development paradigm and to understand the main arguments surrounding international definitions of poverty. Further, students should be familiar with the role of international agencies/organisations in the global economy and their effects in relation to the alleviation of poverty and distribution of resources. Comparisons between countries, on the issues of policies and civil society responses should ‘concretise’ understanding of the constraints and possibilities of different development paths followed.

Intended Learning Outcomes

Students will be expected to be able to critique the theoretical positions on development, including an understanding of the importance of gender dynamics in the development paradigm and to understand the main arguments surrounding international definitions of poverty.

Further, students should be familiar with the role of international agencies/organisations in the global economy and their effects in relation to the alleviation of poverty and distribution of resources. Comparisons between countries, on the issues of policies and civil society responses should ‘concretise’ understanding of the constraints and possibilities of different development paths followed.

Teaching Information

Lectures and seminars.

Assessment Information

Formative: a one hour 'practice exam' to assess and support the students' preparations for the summative assessment.

Summative (100%): a three hour exam which will enable the students to meet the intended learning outcomes for the unit.

All assessment is marked against the published marking criteria for that level, as stated in the Social Policy Programme handbook.

Reading and References

  • Sen, A. and J. Dreze. (1995). India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Pickup, F, S Williams and C Sweetman (2001): Ending violence against women: a challenge for development and humanitarian work. Oxford: Oxfam.
  • Allen, T & Thomas, A (Eds) (2000) Poverty and Development into the 21st Century. Oxford University Press/Open University.

Feedback